Tesla is being pressured to take away 64 Superchargers at stations alongside the New Jersey Turnpike because the native authorities have determined to go along with one other supplier.
Elon Musk claimed corruption with none proof.
The New Jersey Turnpike is a system of controlled-access toll roads that consists of a 100-mile part of vital New Jersey highways.
In 2020, Tesla signed an settlement with the New Jersey Turnpike Authority (NJTA)and constructed 64 Supercharger stalls at 8 stations alongside the turnpike.
The settlement has now expired, and as a substitute of renewing it, the authority determined to present an unique settlement to Applegreen, which already operates in all service areas on the turnpike.
Tesla issued a press release saying that it’s disenchanted with the scenario, however that it has ready for this by constructing new stations off the turnpike for the previous few years:
The New Jersey Turnpike Authority (“NJTA”) has chosen a sole third-party charging supplier to serve the New Jersey Turnpike and isn’t permitting us to co-locate. Consequently, NJTA requested 64 present Supercharger stalls on the New Jersey Turnpike to not be renewed and be decommissioned. Now we have been getting ready for 3 years for this potential end result by constructing 116 stalls off the New Jersey Turnpike, making certain no interruption for our prospects. The map beneath outlines the present substitute Superchargers, and Journey Planner will regulate robotically.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk went a step additional and known as it “corruption” with none proof.
The automaker’s settlement with NJTA expired, they usually determined to go along with a sole supplier. Applegreen will reportedly deploy chargers in any respect 21 turnpike service stops.
Listed here are Tesla’s substitute Superchargers off the turnpike:
Electrek’s Take
I don’t like the choice from the Turnpike authorities. Extra chargers are higher than fewer chargers. Nonetheless, I additionally don’t like Musk calling every little thing he doesn’t like fraud or corruption.
Whereas I agree with Tesla that it’s unreasonable to pressure them to take away the stations, it seems to be an oversight on Tesla’s half to not have included stipulations of their settlement to stop such a state of affairs from taking place within the first place.
Who indicators a deal to deploy tens of millions of {dollars} price of charging gear with solely the fitting to function them there for five years?
It appears to be like like Tesla knew this was coming because it particularly constructed a number of new Supercharger stations off the turnpike to arrange for this.
Alternatively, I don’t just like the Turnpike Authority utilizing the time period “common charger” as if it is a optimistic for Applegreen. They will use CCS, and everyone seems to be shifting to NACS in North America.
Sure, for some time, solely Tesla homeowners should use adapters, however that may quickly change and the present NACS Supercharger shall be much more helpful.
On the finish of the day, the stations are already there. Allow them to function them.
