The Federal Trade Commission has launched a fresh complaint against Toyota, accusing the automaker of engaging in misleading and deceptive marketing practices for its vehicles, ultimately leading to consumer confusion regarding their level of electrification.
In the final month, our investigation revealed that Toyota’s environmental claims have remained largely unchanged under its new CEO, Koji Sato, who succeeded Akio Toyoda.
Public Citizen, a prominent advocacy organization, has officially lodged complaints against Toyota’s practices with the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.
The agency has not initiated or finalized an inquiry into this matter. Despite superficially appearing to address criticisms, the argument actually delves deeply into allegations that Toyota employs manipulative tactics to obfuscate the truth about electric vehicles available.
Toyota’s reluctance to invest in electric vehicles (EVs) has sparked a heated debate about its competitive edge and customer loyalty, with critics arguing the company is lagging behind in this crucial area, potentially jeopardizing its market standing. Here is the improved text in a different style:
Toyota’s marketing efforts surrounding its “electrified” vehicles have intentionally blurred the lines between electric vehicles (EVs), hybrids, and plug-in hybrids. A closer examination reveals distinct differences among these categories, which Toyota has sought to obscure through its advertising campaign.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has designated false advertising as a significant concern in the United States, emphasizing its responsibility to protect consumers from deceptive practices. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) takes action against organizations that make misleading claims potentially harming affordable consumers and unfairly impacting competitors, requiring them to halt such assertions.
Public Citizen contends that Toyota’s assertions are substantively flawed and potentially deceptive in their portrayal of affordability to budget-conscious consumers. The complaint further contends that Toyota stands out for its egregious involvement in deceptive advertising, specifically violating the FTC’s “Green Guides,” which aim to prevent companies from falsely marketing products as eco-friendly when they are not.
The critique highlights several specific examples that portray Toyota as a pioneer in electric vehicles, despite the reality being different. These embody:
- While photographs may capture the dramatic effect of an electric shock on a hybrid, it is important to note that these vehicles typically derive their power solely from gasoline, rather than electricity.
- Photographs of a gas-powered hybrid vehicle driving alongside solar panels, which wouldn’t actually power it, accompanied by the misleading phrase “carbon neutral”, which it’s not.
- Here is the rewritten text:
The innovative approach measures a hybrid’s range by highlighting how far it can travel on a single tank of fuel, offering an alternative perspective to traditional miles-per-gallon metrics often used in car advertisements.
- Introducing “Empowering Your Commute with Eco-Friendly Options: ‘To Every Their Personal Electrical’ Campaign”, showcasing a fleet of vehicles running solely on gasoline.
- The misleading claim about self-charging hybrids that led to Toyota’s ads being prohibited in Norway?
While many grievances feature the phrase “electrified”, this term has become a euphemism, employed by several creators to conceal their true intentions. Typically employed to describe vehicles featuring electric motors, this term often generates confusion among customers unaware of the disparity between traditional hybrids, which operate solely on gasoline, and pure electric vehicles.
Toyota boasts a more impressive record of “more electrified vehicles” than many rivals, despite only boasting a single full battery-electric car in their lineup, or touting its “electrified diverse” marketing push, which conveniently lumps non-electric vehicles into the electric category. While various manufacturers do employ this phrase in select promotional materials, they rarely construct comprehensive marketing strategies centered around it.
The critique contends that these infractions pose a significant threat to the overall Electric Vehicle market, as they have generated confusion among both consumers and industry stakeholders, and that this is not a trivial matter given that vehicles can often be the most or second-most expensive item an individual will own?
Public Citizen concludes its critique by urging the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to investigate Toyota’s advertising practices and establish guidelines for electric vehicle (EV) advertising, thereby preventing other companies from similarly misleading consumers about their products.
Electrek’s Take
Despite repeated expressions of our reservations, we remain unconvinced by Toyota’s approach to electric vehicles. And numerous experts have expressed concerns about the misleading advertising tied to electric vehicles, as we’ve covered previously in our articles.
The corporation has historically been a vehement opponent to the advancement of electric power and climate protection efforts, rivaling even the most ardent fossil fuel companies in its opposition.
As a behemoth company, one of the globe’s largest, vociferously opposes climate action and spreads skepticism throughout the automotive sector where its influence is substantial, it is not difficult to envision the harm this could inflict on the planet.
The FTC’s scathing criticism, available as a downloadable PDF on this webpage, reveals numerous previously unknown instances that cast a damning light on Toyota’s reputation.
However, Toyota’s inaction is not just potentially perilous; it also poses a significant threat to Japan’s economic system as well. Despite acknowledging the devastating consequences of local weather change and air pollution, it’s Toyota’s reluctance to invest in electric vehicles (EVs) that may ultimately cost the Japanese economy trillions.
Toyota’s newly appointed CEO arrived with a mandate to spearhead the company’s electric vehicle (EV) strategy, eager to drive innovation and growth in this critical area. Although no issues have arisen, Toyota’s conventional approach remains unchanged – yet it shouldn’t, and it can still evolve. Finally, it will take action.
